September 08, 2010
Site Search
Site Map
RSS Feeds
2009 VPFF House of Delegates Questionaire
Updated On: Oct 27, 2009 (21:33:00)

 

Many members of the House of Delegates will co-sponsor a bill, or agree to support legislation only to have the caucus leadership decide they don’t want the bill to pass, and dictate how the Delegate should vote on the issue. Members are threatened with being removed from committees or even having primary opponents in the next primary if they don’t cast their vote as directed.. In many cases votes are not even taken on bills. They are simply left to die without as much as a committee hearing.

As a member of the House of Delegates would you support changing the rules to require a formal recorded vote for all introduced bills?

 

Statement 2:

 

 

Question 2:  As a member of the Virginia General Assembly, would you sponsor and\or support legislation to improve funding of the Department of Fire Programs?

 

Statement 3:

In the history of Virginia there has never been funds dedicated for Virginias fire service. Aid to Localities (599 funds) provide over 200 hundred million dollars to law enforcement. Our occupation, firefighting and providing emergency medical services, is no less challenging than law enforcement, therefore it is time to have a dedicated source of revenue in the State's General Fund.

Question 3:  Do you support a permanent line of dedicated funds for the DFP Aid to Localities program in the State's biennial budget.?

 

Statement 4:

In 1996, two firefighters were killed protecting the citizens of the city of Chesapeake. Weeks after their deaths the city of Chesapeake notified their families they would no longer be provided health insurance coverage. The Virginia Professional Fire Fighters worked with the General Assembly to create the Line of Duty Act. The legislation provides a death benefit, and in 2000 was improved to guarantee health insurance coverage to state and local law enforcement officers, firefighters and their families that are killed or permanently disabled while performing their duties for the citizens of the Commonwealth. All benefits are funded through the Line of Duty Act Fund which is administered by the State Comptroller’s Office.

Please answer the following three questions, with the questions and your responses standing alone and of their own weight and importance.

4a.  As a member of the Virginia General Assembly, would you support keeping the present program in place without shifting the burden of funding to the localities?

4b.  In 2005, the health insurance benefit was extended to state law enforcement officers (and their families) who were killed or permanently disabled since April 1966. As a member of the Virginia General Assembly, would you support guarantying the same benefit to local law enforcement officers, firefighters and emergency medical service personnel (and their families), without shifting the burden of funding to the localities?

4c.  As a member of the Virginia General Assembly, would you work with the Virginia Professional Fire Fighters to develop a mechanism for funding the improvements in the Line of Duty Act

 

.

Statement 5:

In Virginia, $4.25 of the cost of renewing a license plate for a vehicle goes to the Office of EMS to be distributed to localities. This money is used by rescue squads and EMS providers for training, and to purchase equipment. Many EMS agencies across the Commonwealth have been able to purchase new defibrillators, and other advanced life support equipment that they may not have otherwise been able to purchase. $.25 of this fund can be used for training of paramedics. This is very important to localities to provide better service in rural areas of the Commonwealth.

As a member of the House of Delegates how would you work to ensure these funds are not diverted for other use and dedicated for EMS purposes?

Statement 6:

Faced with reduced revenue sources many cities in the Commonwealth have reduced staffing in their Fire/EMS Departments to cut costs. This practice puts both firefighters and the citizens of Virginia at increased risk. There is a nationally recognized standard for staffing in which all departments in the Commonwealth fail to meet. The National Fire Protection Association provides standards for every aspect of the Fire Service. It is the recognized industry leader and most departments in the Commonwealth and the Nation use its standards. The standard "NFPA 1710" sets staffing minimum levels for departments to operate at safer levels.

Following September 11, 2001, International Association of Fire Fifghters asked congress to provide resources that would provide staffing for our nations fire departments. With the help of former Senator John Warner congress created a bill called Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response known as SAFER. SAFER provides funding on a matching grant type basis with the locality picking up the cost after 4 years. During former Governor Mark Warner's term, his approved bi-ennial budget included providing two years of funding to localities in order to provide safe staffing of fire departments. 

Question 6:  Would you support the inclusion of matching funds in the general fund for SAFER in the next biennial budget?

Statement 7:

The Virginia Retirement System and the other local public pension systems in Virginia provide pension benefits to retired Virginia public servants and their beneficiaries. The Virginia public pension funds have well over $52 billion under management and are well positioned for sustained growth and continued good funding status.

Virginia pensions are cost effective; allow localities and the state to attract and retain qualified employees; and are estimated to add about $3.8 billion of economic stimulus to the Virginia economy annually.

 

 

Question 7:

Would you oppose legislation that would change the current defined benefit program to a defined contribution program for current, future, or disabled employees?

 

Statement 8:

In Virginia state and local employees who have an issue arising out of employment can settle their issues through a grievance process. The process involves four steps. The first is with their immediate supervisor, and is considered an informal step. The second step is with the department head. The third step is with the city or county manager. The final step is heard by a panel of employees or a hearing officer. In steps 1 and 2, the employee is not allowed to have a representative. The employer may have unlimited participations present at every step. There are some employers who use these early steps to intimidate the employee. Even if an employee wins the grievance the employer may disregard the verdict.

Questions 8a and 8b:

8a.  Would you support a change in the State code that would provide the employees right to have a representative in every step of the grievance process?

8b.  Would you support changing the existing State code that would bind the decisions made by the grievance panel or hearing officer?

 

Statement 9: 

Firefighters and EMT’s have the right under Firefighter Bill of Rights in the Code of Virginia to certain rights if they are being investigated for acts that may lead to demotion, suspension, or termination. These involve the right to be advised in writing of what they are being investigated for, who is investigating, and any possible disciplinary action. Some departments are very progressive and fair. Many departments disregard the Firefighter Bill of Rights and provide no due process to their employees.

Questions 9a and 9b:

9a.  Would you support code language that would provide protections for firefighter's against employers who fail to abide by this portion of the state code?

9b.  Would you support a change in the State code that would provide the firefighter's right to have a representative when they are called in for interrogation?

 

Statement 10:

The International Code Committee recently met and approved building codes that would require the installation of sprinklers in new 1 and 2 family dwellings. Studies and tests have shown a dramatic decrease in damage to a residence that has sprinklers installed. Sprinklers can mean the difference of life and death for the residents of the occupancy. In many cases with lightweight construction, sprinklers have saved the life of firefighters. In 2007 a firefighter was killed after the dwelling collapsed after less than 30 minutes of the dwelling catching fire. In 2008 a building collapsed on 5 firefighters after 17 minutes of being on fire. Home builders are opposed to the installation of sprinklers in residential housing based solely on the cost. Builders are willing to spend more on landscaping and media rooms than a system that has proven to save lives. A residential sprinkler system can be installed in a new residence for around $1.00 per square foot., a small price to pay for the impact these systems has on a fire.

Question 10:  As a member of the House of Delegates would you work to ensure that sprinkler requirements remain in the building code?Would you support code language that would provide protections for firefighter's against employers who fail to abide by this portion of the state code.

 

Statement 11:

Congress is poised to pass the Public Safety Employer- Employee Cooperation Act. This legislation allows public safety employees to form unions and bargain for their working conditions and pay. This bill does not in any way affect the Right to Work Law. The law will also prohibit strikes of any kind, and the bill does not include binding arbitration or any other penalty should a locality not agree to terms set forth by a union. The bill simply says that an employer must recognize a union and agree to listen to them as the designated bargaining agent for a group of employees.

Question 11:  Do you feel public safety employees have a basic right to form organizations and discuss working conditions?

 

Question 5:

Questions 4a,4b, and 4c:

In 2003, the Senate Commerce & Labor Committee asked for a statewide needs analysis for training and equipment for Virginia’s Fire Service. The Virginia Department of Fire Programs has conducted annual surveys of Virginia's Volunteer and Career Departments. During that time the DFP has reported an average return of 70% of these surveys. From these surveys the DFP has concluded that Virginia's fire service is not adequately trained and woefully under equipped to handle today's challenges, i.e. house fires, auto accidents, haz-mat incidents, etc.

Question 1:

Statement 1:






Member Login
Username:

Password:


Not registered yet?
Click Here to sign-up.

Forgot Your Login?
<<  September 2010  >>
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Important Links
IAFF
Virginia Professional Firefighters
Henrico Fire
Henrico County Federal Credit Union
Virginia Department of Fire Programs
Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services
Old Dominion Professional Firefighters Burn Foundation
Central Virginia Burn Camp
Florian Foundation
AFSA Va Chapter
Muscular Dystrophy Association
Mesothelioma Cancer Center
Google
Weather Report
<<  September 2010  >>
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Visit Unions-America.com!
 Top of Page © Copyright 2010, Henrico Professional Firefighters Association, All Rights Reserved.
Powered By UnionActive™
Hide the Right Hand Column